Wednesday 25 July 2012

Ugly, Black People

"Today's lesson is on self-respect," said Captain Mehta, as he walked into the class with a smile. "Apne aap ko kisi se kam nahin sochna (don't think that you are inferior to anybody)", he told the class and I believed that this lecture would be far more interesting than the previous one we had on 'Communication Skills'.

"No matter who you are and immaterial of what job you do, you must always believe in yourself. Whenever you feel down and low, just say these words to yourself - 'I am also great.' " Makes sense, I thought. He was speaking about the same things which are talked about in spiritual texts, self-help books and personality development courses.

Then, directing his gaze at the frail lad sitting in the first row, he asked him to stand up. He subsequently asked the guy next to him, Rohan, to stand up as well. Rohan stood at about six feet and with dark, curly hair, he had a wheatish complexion. Captain Mehta then asked the frail Marathi lad on the left, "Kunal, tu yeh bata (tell me)... who among you both has a greater personality?" (as if it a quantity you can measure using the sabzi-wala's beam-balance)

Kunal looked at Cpt. Mehta with his bright, dark eyes and he laughed. "Mera hi better hai, sir!" (I have a better personality)

Clearly, Kunal had understood the lesson in Self-respect and I was about to clap as I thought the experiment  was complete. But Cpt. Mehta spoke once more: "Kya hai yeh, Kunal! How can you say you have a better personality... Look at yourself - you're small and black. And look at him - he's well built, muscular, has great complexion and he looks so confident."

Kunal nodded. There was nothing much else he could do. Then Captain Mehta said, "But tumhe aisa sochna hi nahin hai (you mustn't think like this)... So what if you are dark? You must think that you are equal to others... And THAT, Gentlemen, is Self-Respect." He said that last line with great pride.

So that's the lesson we're teaching people these days, eh? It's OKAY if you're dark. It's not your mistake if you're black. Or, as another gentleman phrased it a few days ago, "Bhagwaan ne banaya hum sab ko (God made us all) And sometimes, he wants to put us in our place... Not always can he give us all that we want." And then I thought about what I read on Quora a few days ago, "We're definitely not a racist country. Look at all the values we are brought up with." Values, indeed.

While I thought that this lesson on 'self-respect' was the worst one I had ever been taught, what made my blood boil was the subsequent lecture we had. "Hi, my name is S.K. Sra," said the man who hobbled into class. I forget what the content of his lecture was about because I couldn't get over this one 'example' he talked about:

"When I was in Barnala, Punjab, in my youth, I used to be a teacher in a school... and I got to interact with many little children. But there is this one incident I remember about this little girl," he said. "She was the daughter of a Commanding Officer and he was my friend. She was from Tamil Nadu, and like a lot of people from the south, she was very dark... And to make matters worse, she was surrounded by beautiful girls from Punjab. I observed her for a while and she looked very sad... I knew at once what was the problem..."

I knew where he was heading but I controlled myself. He continued - "I told her that it doesn't matter if she was black... All she had to do was be smart. Be intelligent. And she could have friends... So what if you are dark? You can overcome your difficulties by being smart. Everyone loves smart people and besides, we don't discriminate on the basis of skin colour!"

"You fucking idiot, if this is not discrimination, then what is it? People don't want your pity for being dark - they are as pretty as you are; prettier actually, as their stomachs aren't falling out of their pants like yours." I don't know if people understand this - but if PITY is the emotion you feel for people darker than you, then you are a racist.

Sometimes, I wish I'd been born as dark as coal, just so that I could have heard someone try to be condescending to my face... And then I'd have carved his guts out using a kitchen knife. I'm sure the courts would see the violence as provoked. And it'd be totally worth the Prison time.

All these incidents has one looking at other aspects of this ugly society: cosmetic products which promise to make you white, our abysmal attitude towards African tourists, the fact that most of our 'backward castes' are dark-skinned... The list goes on.

Ultimately, one looks at the ruling class and is left bewildered: there aren't many dark-skinned politicians in a country where a massive portion of the people are dark, and I'm not talking just of South India. Many people from states like Uttar Pradesh, Bihar and West Bengal are as dark as people from the South. So, why no dark leaders? (except for Mayawati and a couple of others) Are we really a forward-thinking people? Or do we still think it's below our dignity to be ruled by a man or woman who is darker than us?

On that note, I wonder how many votes Mayawati got from the fairer upper classes of Uttar Pradesh when she won...

Apart from politics, what provides a snapshot of India's zeitgeist better than the media does! I turned to the Television Channels and Bollywood, with only one question in my mind - 'Are we really that racist?' I'll let you answer that question yourself but first I'd like you to name five Bollywood heroes who are darker than the average Indian. Wait, forget that: Name two Bollywood heroes who are as dark as the average Indian. There's no point talking about heroines here as the darkest lady is probably Bipasha Basu, and she covers herself with enough paint so that she can fool the audience.

As a country, we are proud of calling ourselves secular and we boast about our religious tolerance. We say that we are empowering women and alleviating gender inequality. We talk about taking steps to remove caste-ism in the society. But what about racism? We are racists even before we know what caste someone belongs to. Why don't we acknowledge that?

If we weren't: We'd have had a few black news-readers by now. We'd have had a black prime minister. And what the hell, we would have a black Bollywood heroine.

30 comments:

  1. hmmmm....
    indeed a senti post. read this poem: Telephone Conversation
    by Wole Soyinka

    The price seemed reasonable, location
    Indifferent. The landlady swore she lived
    Off premises. Nothing remained
    But self-confession. "Madam," I warned,
    "I hate a wasted journey—I am African."
    Silence. Silenced transmission of
    Pressurized good-breeding. Voice, when it came,
    Lipstick coated, long gold rolled
    Cigarette-holder pipped. Caught I was foully.
    "HOW DARK?" . . . I had not misheard . . . "ARE YOU LIGHT
    OR VERY DARK?" Button B, Button A.* Stench
    Of rancid breath of public hide-and-speak.
    Red booth. Red pillar box. Red double-tiered
    Omnibus squelching tar. It was real! Shamed
    By ill-mannered silence, surrender
    Pushed dumbfounded to beg simplification.
    Considerate she was, varying the emphasis--
    "ARE YOU DARK? OR VERY LIGHT?" Revelation came.
    "You mean--like plain or milk chocolate?"
    Her assent was clinical, crushing in its light
    Impersonality. Rapidly, wave-length adjusted,
    I chose. "West African sepia"--and as afterthought,
    "Down in my passport." Silence for spectroscopic
    Flight of fancy, till truthfulness clanged her accent
    Hard on the mouthpiece. "WHAT'S THAT?" conceding
    "DON'T KNOW WHAT THAT IS." "Like brunette."
    "THAT'S DARK, ISN'T IT?" "Not altogether.
    Facially, I am brunette, but, madam, you should see
    The rest of me. Palm of my hand, soles of my feet
    Are a peroxide blond. Friction, caused--
    Foolishly, madam--by sitting down, has turned
    My bottom raven black--One moment, madam!"--sensing
    Her receiver rearing on the thunderclap
    About my ears--"Madam," I pleaded, "wouldn't you rather
    See for yourself?"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's downright sad, man! These people need to be sat down and gutted.

      Delete
  2. I have but one query:
    One cousion sister of mine has a flat nose while the rest of the family has an aquiline nose. She gets teased for it.
    Another cousion is fat. She gets teased for that.
    Another cousion has a dark complexion while her own younger brother and parents are fair as an icicle. She too gets teased a lot for that.
    Is this racism? Does it have anything to do with the family/race you are born in?
    Or is it part of the all pervading mentality of what is beautiful/handsome as per us Indians.(tall, slender, fair, aquiline nose and the rest)
    (Note: I am not joking, this is a real example)

    ReplyDelete
  3. It's okay for each person to have preferences about the looks that they prefer... But to have the audacity to tell a dark person - "It's okay to be dark... You need to COMPENSATE by being smart" - is unacceptable. If you're even trying to contest this point, I'll be ashamed.

    Another example:

    If you guys remember Mr. Bhagat's book 2 STATES, he clarifies two or three times - "Ananya is independent, modern, educated, practical and logical (like most girls are) and is fair unlike other South-Indian girls"

    ReplyDelete
  4. I still do not understand how this is racism. As per me this is shallow thinking, that equates a person's personality to his/her appearance.
    I do agree that the way Mr Bhagat puts it is blunt, brutal, insensitive and an example of what I wrote above. Its a problem most Delhiites/Punjabis/other N Indians suffer from. I have been at the receiving end several. Most notably for being a bag of bones. Apparently the compensation in my case as well was worked out as being smart. :P

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maybe what you think is shallow-mindedness is actually racism. Acceptance, friend. Only then, we'll get out of it. Try calling an African American 'black' in USA and then try telling people that you meant it as a joke.

      Delete
  5. Dear Suhas,

    I appreciate your viewpoint. It's people like you who're making this country a place worth living in. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Compliments on your post! Nicely written.
    There are a couple of points though that I want to put. I couldn’t agree more with you that casteism racism regionalism... or any of these are deadly loopholes in Indian society.

    But what I feel is that caste and creed go much beyond in intensity and impact than color... I am no fair or dark... nor am I very keen observant or good judge of color/beauty… but as an average person I haven’t feel any urge or attraction towards the so called beautiful ones... nor the otherwise...

    And we do have Shahrukh who certainly is neither fair nor amazingly beautiful. We did have Narasimha Rao, Deva Gowda, Chandra Shekhar... none fair. Right?

    All my point is... that undoubtedly racism... if present in any form is fatal... especially for our multicolored- multicultural country... but there are other discriminating forces which are weakening and killing us in much worse ways.

    will be great if you cover those...

    ReplyDelete
  7. Marishaa,

    Thanks. I agree with your assessment that there are many other great evils plaguing our society, and 'racism' is only one of the many devils of our time. But the point of this post was to address the Racism problem and nothing else. I will however try to cover other issues as well in subsequent posts.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As for actors and politicians, you can describe all these people as 'wheatish' at best. They aren't the dark folk who inhabit many parts of the country. Anyway, let's not nitpick - I agree that there have been anomalies - people who are dark in positions of power. But it is still disproportionate to our population distribution. Don't you agree?

      Delete
  8. Spot on mate. U hit the nail on the head. Only after travelling to another multicultural country and analyzing the situation in India in an unbiased manner have I reached the same conclusion as stated by you: WE ARE A RACIST COUNTRY, and its ingrained in every one of us, irrespective of what one might want to believe. When I hear some Indian guys here make comments about some African students studying on Uni, I am disgusted and ashamed to call them friends. We are racist by our upbringing, by the stuff on TV & movies we are exposed to, and by our language, if not anything else.

    ReplyDelete
  9. When I talk about racism in the country, all people here are worried about is how they can crack jokes about dark people without being considered racist. They think it's absolutely essential to crack these jokes, without which life won't be worth living. 'Abey woh black hai... why shouldn't I laugh at him?' they ask.

    ReplyDelete
  10. More than your article your comments to other people's post made me speak out. So lets begin.

    About your article, I think you still have to understand what 'Racism' is. If you say that someone is Chinki probably that. Or if you say someone in Black than maybe that (but both these terms have been used to characterize certain race - Mongolians and Africans, those are races).
    But if your understanding of the racism in term "Black" is related to a dark-skinned Asians, than you have a long way to maturity.

    When we sat down to write an international convention on elimination of all forms of discrimination we used few different terms, race, colour, descent, or national or ethnic origin. Mind you my friend, 'Colour', 'race' and 'ethnicity' are all different forms of discrimination but each of them are different and independent of each other.

    Cracking jokes about a dark-skinned Indian wont make a person racist but calling an East -Indian chinki will make you racist, and so you got a judgement by the Supreme Court causing much stir and some nonsensical answers by Indian brothers "you call a Bihari a Bihari and you call a Chinki a Chinki". Very funny. You try doing that and you might invite some trouble now :)

    Being wheatish, dusky, black or even an albino is not racist - its differentiation for sure, but based on the concept of beauty and color. We Indians believe White is more beautiful than black. Probably it has something to do with hotness and humidity, I dont know I still have to figure it out and I wont mind telling you if I know why we think white is more beautiful.

    Second, about your comments, specially the one i produce below -

    "Dear Suhas,

    I appreciate your viewpoint. It's people like you who're making this country a place worth living in. Thank you."

    I kind of understood the satire in it, so just saying, Art. 19 of Constitution of India gives us a freedom of speech and expression, unfortunately our politicians these days are doing a lot of media and expression censorship, which we disliked.
    You referred to - 'In America'. Well in the same America, if someone tells you that your article is a piece of shit or your Congress MP is a bastard, they dont mind it and dont be cynical about it. I am not at all a fan of America and having dealt with a lot of Americans so far I only figured out I like one out of 100. But I surely like the fact that unlike we Indians they are generally very tolerant of other persons view.

    And you can say pretty appropriately that my provocation to comment on your nicely written article with some fundamental mistakes, is probably my intolerance towards your freedom of expression. I would acknowledge that, but my intentions is to stir an intelligent debate on all the points i raised.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ritumbra, I greatly appreciate the time you've taken to make this comment... Any comment however critical is welcome on this blog, but not everybody makes a coherent argument. When people stop trying to debate and all that they can say is 'this is the most stupid article I've read until now', then I'm sorry but I have a right to voice my opinion too. And you suggest that I made a satirical answer? Where? :-P

      Anyway, I'm not trying to stop anyone's opinion from being voiced... that'd undermine the whole point blogging, no? But let's get to the argument now:

      Technically, the phenomenon we are dealing with in India is called COLOURISM, which in turn is a type of racism... I understand the argument uoure making about calling a NE Indian a 'chink' and I'm glad the courts have reacted to that. I personally have 'chink' friends who abhorred and feared that taunt. But the BLACKIE term is equally bad, if not worse. And the issue deteriorates further when we act as though the behaviour is right. And justified. (Do check out the Wikipedia article on Colorism and I'm sure you'll appreciate where I come from)

      People often think that we Indians are a perfectly assimilated people of a single racial history. Sadly, though, this isn't the case. The white Aryans of central Asia invaded and destroyed most of the black Dravidians of India - during the days of indra and the Indus valley civilization. And the behaviour we see today might well be something which has its roots in our ancient past.

      Colourist or racist, it's an attitude which is doing no one any good... and I wonder why people are defending it.

      Delete
    2. Anirudh,

      Well, putting it all to white Aryans and Black Dravidians is not a very good argument, we have mingled and mated centuries since to produce colored babies :)

      That said, in Indian family context being sympathized of my dusky-ness i called it 'family apartheid' as a teenager, but to be brutally honest is that so?

      Now putting it in larger regional context of being from south-india getting ill-treated in north and being from north-india getting ill-treated in south, is that really racism - first technically its not racism, its discrimination on grounds of color or region.

      Now putting that in context of social status or societal divide. Is that just the color which separates them ? I believe it is the intolerance for caste and cultural differences?

      Coming to the point of beauty, white is beautiful. Ofcourse white is beautiful, it looks serene and the Gods in the temple are all in white marble (except where the fable requires God to be blue or black or red). And it looks enchantingly beautiful, when the white snow covers the landscape during Christmus, we love it. Black can be on other hand depressing for some and mystic for others and some may find the mysticism beautiful. But that is just how we perceive about colors or rather how we are taught to look at them (famously, little girls like pink and baby boys like blue).

      Breaking beyond color and our visual likeness towards them probably comes with how mature we are or rather how independently we can think of colors.

      Just for reference I have a friend who sells Fairness cream in Korea and another one selling hair-straightener to Japanese :)

      and well, I am not sure if anyone on the thread is 'actually' defending colorist or racist, I thought its a blog and people are expressing their opinions :)

      However, I am sure the 'blacks' in USA while may love watching Russel Peters may also laugh to hear that Indians call each other black. Lets be honest about it, we are colored people (and by this I only mean, we are 'colored' and not 'black' or 'white' or 'yellow').

      and well if you think someone has not justified their concerns or comments than you can always ask them, maybe they have a point to make or maybe they are just 'white' or 'black' or 'chinki' and think that this differentiation is not a 'real concern' against what they may be facing.

      Also, I dont normally read Wikipedia. Unless I have to read interesting stories about FBI Moles. But for matters like discrimination, there is a hell lot of better literature and policy debates to refer to.

      Delete
    3. Ritumbra,

      Once again you've proven that you're an absolute genius. You value your own opinion more than what thousands of people have said from across the world over the years... Equality is a concept you don't seem to believe in. Kudos.

      But let me try to argue with that wonderful mind of yours once more. Also, please let me know what 'hell lot of better literature and policy debates to refer to' you are talking about... so that I can enlighten myself too.

      What literature reinforces the need to deride a dark person? - I'm sure it must be a great text. Now, for the whatever else that has come through the text you have written:

      Racism is bad. Colourism and Shadism is bad too. People don't become more beautiful retaining all their original features, just by applying Fair and Lovely. By Plastic Surgery, maybe... Not otherwise. 'Family Apartheid' is probably worse than racism, since you brought it up.

      Again, I'm not arguing terminology here. I'm just saying that if you find Blacks depressing, there should be a law which puts you in prison :)

      Delete
    4. what should i say here goes an almost 25 speaking stuffs without a background or reality check ;)

      Well I suggest, if you are so annoyed by opinions, maybe you should consider not writing in public domain.
      I can post you some nice little-girl-dream-diaries if you want me to.

      Oh! yes I can speak in a language which you reply me in.

      And as for your 'literature needs', try google scholar to start with, initially it might just throw you some unworthy articles, but than you can carefully choose to stick to UN or WB resources and slowly it might just lead you to a more wider world of better quality knowledge.

      I wonder why people are so afraid of debates and discussions. Or maybe its just being "Indian". OH! I forgot my country men are known for arguments, quite frivolous ones as well.

      Delete
    5. and BTW I do expect people to know the terminologies and definitions. Call it an over-expectation, but than my fellow policy makers(read statesmen like Kofi Anan and Mandela) did spend decades in deriving them. So atleast read the basic conventional text (did i not mention that in my first post, Oh! yes I did). We have a maxim 'Ignorantia juris non excusat'. Well just saying

      Delete
    6. I'd like to reply to every line you've said, but your first sentence makes no grammatical or syntactical sense at all...

      All the same, I took your advice and read up a little from various books Google Scholar gave me. I think you need to read these more than I do, since you very clearly seem to feel that you are physically superior to people with a darker skin-tone than yours.

      Please read:
      (1) "The Persistent Problem of Colorism: Skin Tone, Status, and Inequality" - Margaret Hunter
      (2) "Colorism: A darker shade of pale" - Taunya Lovell Banks

      And do read the last part - "Simple Solutions to Colorism Claims"

      Maybe what I'm suggesting is a long, arduous struggle but we must fight nonetheless; not simply sit down and continue discriminating as you seem to suggest.

      Delete
    7. Did you ignore the fact, that I said I am myself Dusky in complexion and no one believes I am a Punjabi girl (I look more of a Keralite or sometimes a Bengali). Or you just like arguing for nothing ! some MCP tendencies - (Why the hell anyone wrote more than "Good Job mate" on my blog comments)

      BTW I am quite happy that you read something better than wikipedia

      Delete
    8. Are you really that narcissistic that you think the post is about you, or are you plain stupid? I don't care if you're black as coal or as white as chalk... I don't care if you change colours at night. As people say, Once a bigot, always a bigot. Are people like you top the list. Way to go :-)

      And I'm flabbergasted by the fact that a person who hasn't written one proper sentence in several miles of text knows phrases as big as 'MCP' and even a bit of Latin! Google scholar has taught you quite a bit, no? Well done.

      Thank you Ritumbra, but I see no point in trying to educate you out of your rigid bigoted stance.

      Delete
  11. Also, just on another note, I am wheatish punjabi girl who looks either someone adopted from Kerala or Kolkata, depending on how I am dressed. And my fascination for white color made me marry a white man. I wonder what my future kids might have to say about it.
    But more than white skin, I thought Indian man are very very shallow in the way they think.

    ReplyDelete
  12. The point you make is valid but the examples you cite weaken your point and trivialize your rather strong post. Naseeruddin Shah, Irrfan Khan, Nawazuddin Siddiqui, Om Puri, Manoj Bajpai, Paresh Rawal, Nana Patekar, Mithun, Sunil Shetty - just to name a few famous and successful bollywood actors who have the average Indian complexion or are even darker than that. Kajol, at the peak of her career, was one of the darkest Indian actresses anyone had ever seen. Smita Patil and Konkana Sen Sharma are not much different. I do agree that with women in India, typically north India, a general prerequisite for her to be called beautiful is that she should be fair, and the numerous fairness creams brazenly tout themselves by playing with the self-respect of millions of not-so-fair women and it is something that should not be tolerated anywhere, definitely not in a country that is proud of its diversity.
    As for politicians, Mayawati, Mamta Banerjee, Mulayam Singh Yadav, Kalyan Singh, Arjun Munda, Nitish Kumar, Raman Singh, Vijay Bahuguna and Nitin Gadkari - I am sure they are not your typical fair politicians but they are huge.
    The point I am trying to make is the racism (if that’s the right term) you are talking about doesn't hinder anyone to be successful in India. So, in my opinion, by citing these examples you probably digressed from the point you were trying to make. What this colour based differentiation does is it denies them the self-respect and dignity anyone deserves as a human. But then, it is not limited to colour. It extends to physical features as well – like Tariyal rightly pointed out.
    Anyway, I am 100% with you when you contend that why pity them. Pity is one of the loftiest yet one of the most condescending virtues.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Arun,

      Thanks again for such a well constructed comment... Makes it easy to respond to. But first, I implore you to read articles on COLOURISM; a phenomenon some people refuse to acknowledge and others say is correct. The Wikipedia article was enough to convince Pinky, so I'm thinking you'll find your peace there too :)

      And I am not suggesting that dark people are doomed to fail in India; your examples have thrown quite a bit of light on the success stories. But these come as anomalies to the general rule, rather than as a result of it.

      Simple example:

      I dislike Mayawati's casteist politics and statue building overdrive and I don't think she'd have made a great Prime Minister for the country. But when people were talking about the possibility of that happening, I heard so many people say, "Chee, how can she become PM?! She'll b e the face of our nation! And she's so dark... What'll other countries think of us?"

      I don't know if this is racist or as a certain Ms. Ritumbra says is 'totally justified friendly teasing' until the point of death . But I know one thing for certain - that it is wrong. It is very wrong. A fair person has no right to show pity towards a person darker than him/her.

      You go to Gulf countries or Egypt and this behaviour is quite absent... I haven't seen too much else of the world or I'd cite examples from there as well. So, it's not a universal phenomenon. It's an Indian habit - a weed in our society which has grown roots so deep that it is now a tree.

      A tree which needs to be uprooted.

      Delete
  13. Brother I truly appreciate yours sincerity towards an age old and probably immortal issue but I personally feel that your ruminations serve more to trivialize it. I cud feel an undercurrent of inverted racism inherent in ur post, like being called 'Black' amounts to racial prejudice. There is no harm in calling a spade a spade ( I am alluding to Mr. Bhagat's reference). Secondly I would like to stress on the idea of beauty which u have somehow clubbed with racial prejudices. Brother beauty certainly lies in the eyes of the beholder but there are certain traits that have been universally internalized ( Hope I don't have to mention it here!). It's not that idea of beauty starts from skin and ends there, there is more to it. It's an overall appearance that counts. That's why people love to see Beyonce and find her more desirable than many other fairer ones. Denzel Washington is an another case, more handsome than many other whites around. There are other traits of beauty found in them and even a white is ugly without them, and unfortunately these traits are somehow missing in the Black population predominantly, brother I am referring to physiognomic traits. The only feasible solution to such a problem lies in the assimilation of the fact that it's OK to be whatever we are and being physically ugly is not bad since each one of us is much more than our appearance. There is more to that south Indian girl and I think she should be told that!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Brother I think we both are telling the same story with same honest intention, the only difference is perspective :) U tell from the perspective of a 'Non-Black' who wishes to see this world purged of prejudices and I tell the same story from a view point of a 'Black' who is pragmatic and knows imperfections exist, but wading through them requires paying attention to ones strength. And I think both are important since it attacks the problem from both sides. And once again i wud like to stress that it's ok to be 'ugly'( if we go by prevailing norms) rather it's beautiful when u have realized and internalized this fact!

      Delete
    2. If you are indeed 'black' as you claim to be, then you have every right to feel inferior to the 'whites' of this world. Please don't generalize it though, and say that every dark person like you must feel inferior. It is your opinion :)

      And since you seem to agree partly with what I'm saying, let's take this one step further. You are saying that I'm an idealist; that I believe in something which would make the world a better place, but is very hard to achieve.

      I agree that it is very hard to achieve. But we must try, must we not? Or do we want to continue bringing in more generations of dark folks into this prejudiced world, and mentally traumatize them as well? It'd be kinder to kill them, no?

      At least that way there would be only 'beautiful people' in the world.

      Delete
    3. Realizing one is 'Black' and who happens to inhabit this imperfect world and feeling a sense of inferiority is entirely different.I have never intended that one should feel inferior for that thing!I am only stressing a fact known as self-awareness and not self-hatred for being 'Black', which though unintentionally emanates from ur post. I never told you an idealist, you may be a dreamer but the scary real world does not solve its problem that way. Knowing the truth about oneself does not make anyone inferior rather it helps in exploring greater truths about oneself and realizes even greater objectives!
      And, one thing,apart from all these, since we are debating ideas and performing an art known as polemics, I thought u shud be reminded of that, becoz u dont know its basics, u shud never get personal and stoop to individual level, it hardly matters whether I am a "Black' or whatever, what matters instead is opinion and you shud get over these childish things of 'you' and 'I', earlier the better.

      Delete
  14. God help you people

    ReplyDelete
  15. Color prejudice may be a culturally learnt behavior. It's just one of several. In his book, The Third Chimpanzee, white American author Jared Diamond says, the black New Guinea tribals he stayed with offered to find him a beautiful black bride of their tribe, rather than the "ugly, pale yellow haired women" from the west.

    Life :-P

    ReplyDelete