Saturday 14 February 2009

Musings On V-Day: Charles Darwin Was Wrong!

Often have I wondered how a man on a mere five year voyage across the world's southern seas broke the closely guarded codes on which the world we live in is based and unlocked the mysteries of life, the universe and the future of mankind. A secret - woven eons ago by the Almighty's own fingers, staying cryptic for billions of years was unlocked, they say, by a man called Charles Darwin. So simple, was it really? A theory he put forward called 'Evolution' and how man came into existance and what he is to be - is what he "explained".

It's February fourteenth and SAD or Single Awareness Day - as put forth by another despo of this world (you see - the Earth will never be short of these people) called C - is here once again. And once again, I find myself staring stupidly at happy looking couples, wondering why fate is being unfair to me. Reflecting deeply on the subject and coming up with ways to avert future disaster, I stumble upon a number of facts; facts with undeniable evidence and a potential to revolutionize our lives and what we think about it. They all lead to the same conclusion - Charles Darwin was wrong.

On the backdrop of the Valentine's Day "celebrations" (and the bandhs), my inspired mind has come up with a brilliant case which could dismantle all the present scientific machinery. Do we need a new theory? I go on to put forward my arguments....

The rudimentary question: Why is a human being single? Single people recieve a number of queries, stupid as they may sound, regarding their status. One such strange question (which could only emanate from one who is well into the realms of stupidity and dumbness) was - "Why are you single? Not into girls, huh?" Stupefied as I was by the retarded question, I wondered whether being in a relationship always lead to imbecility and whether love reduced the size of your brain to a quantum dot. Why would a sane person not be "into" the opposite gender. It's quite obvious, I would think. But as the story goes, I began to wonder - What is the real reason behind one's celibacy? Though everyone say that they want to end the long dry spells in their lives, why don't they care to do anything about it? This list of questions went on and I realized that I had to note them down and take a shot at them, one at a time (1.5 yrs of engineering can do that to you).

The reason to staying single; is there any? I just read this G Talk status, apt for the occasion of 'V - Day' - 'If there was a definite way for love, then it would be a lot easier but a lot less magical' and it brings me to the point - You should be allowed to forget about the magical part! The world would be a much better, more satisfied and a lot less desperate place to live in if there were a sure shot method to aquire love - potions, enchantments, anything.... An algorithm for love is long overdue. (Sheldon Cooper, where are you?) Anyway, one major reason for 'singleness', I gather, is because of the difficulty in starting off. But there are other grounds, in fact plenty.

One such ground may be that inner feeling some possess suggesting that one hasn't really met their match and that when he/she comes, the skies would light up and the heavens would glow. Everyone has certain expectations regarding their match. I'm not being biased here nor am I being a chauvinist but it is time I take the standpoint of an average male (for a more accurate viewing of the situation). Every guy expects his lady to be beautiful, charming (they are different attributes, aren't they?), intelligent, fun to hang out with, **many more good adjectives go here**.... (Since everyone judges using similar parameters, an algorithm shouldn't be so difficult after all) But seldom do we find such an entity with all the aforementioned attributes. So a compromise is struck and a relationship results. But some people continue their quest for the quintessential partner and believe that 'compromise' and 'love' can't go together in the same paragraph, let alone a line!

Then why, I ask, don't we as humans improve. According to Charles Darwin, natural selection and evolution lead to better and better human beings. The should finally be  a point where a girl can be all of these - Highly intelligent, stunningly pretty, possessing a brilliant sense of humour etc. A more holistic approach would suggest that guys should be all the things which a girl expects. Clearly, neither of the above things are true and 'evolution' has found its first loophole. On the flipside, we find hardly any improvement in Homo Sapiens. So much so that the great constancy equation has been coined regarding the product of beauty and intelligence. A variation would state that product of 'Beauty', 'Brains' and 'Availability' remains constant! (This is probably applicable irrespective of age and sex)

So, is there really no scope for improvement?? According to Darwin, we, as a species, should long be gone as we cannot 'adapt'. Another postulate which has fallen. And finally, if our not finding a partner is due to some other reasons, whatever it may be, we should be able to reconcile to these facts which means people would be much more satisfied (read: lot less desperate) - this is adaptation as well, right?

And thus have I successfully destroyed a concept built on illogical assumptions and irrelevant observations. I now wait patiently until some international journal of repute publishes my theory. While I wait for my Nobel Prize, my mind wanders back to the fact that I am still single. Valentine's Day has almost completely passed. Maybe next year at this time, I won't be making a similar post. My fingers are crossed.

P.S. My thoughts have been echoed and reinforced by a similar mind going by the name 'Mister' and hence have gained certain amount of credibility.

P.P.S. Contrary to popular inference, I am definitely not desperate! I post merely in the interest of the world's greater good.

20 comments:

  1. Evolution is such that all beings are going to be single one day. It's about survival of the fittest and you can only survive if you dump the excess baggage. Plus, most of the more illustrious people in the world have either been single or 'happy'. So keep you fingers crossed, not for banalities like the next V-day, but for seeing the day come when everyone is single and V-day becomes We-day.

    ReplyDelete
  2. If evolution was indeed wrong, how would you explain the olympic records being broken every year and the fact that more than 1% of the total animal population is under the threat of extinction?
    After a thorough contemplation of your views, I've decided to standby darwinian principles...
    My friend,survival of the fittest and evolution is a universal law and still holds, but dumping the 'excess baggage' would be possible only the day when the homosapien would evolve to learn the efficacious art of agamogenesis(Yep,you read that right...Google it up :P).

    ReplyDelete
  3. @ Lefty,

    Hmmm... The Excess Baggage theory definitely seems to be valid. Maybe, I must incorporate that as my last postulate. And We - Day doesn't seem too far off considering the fact that it is a lot easier to get single than vice - versa. I truly look forward to that day! The days of the Jedi will be here soon.

    @ Jetty (and his baffling articulation)

    That would be a whole new theory, my friend. Just because 'Evolution' is more convenient than 'Genesis' doesn't mean we buy the man's fabrications! As for Agamogenesis (I spelled it correctly! And no, I did not look), it will be the final blow to 'evolution' - with us "stepping down the ladder" to join our Amoeba and Paramecium brethren.

    ReplyDelete
  4. you show signs of being disturbed while writing ur blog.being single myself i agree with u on principle.....but i wish u would have proposed a stronger alternative model.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Ah, at the beginning of this post, I got the feeling this was going to be legendary. Turns out I feel I've heard this before- maybe from you, yourself. Anyhoo, sometimes you got to follow random philosophies like 50 Cent's- Get rich, or die trying!
    And, Darwin couldn't be that wrong. Look around, isn't there more greenery than ever before? It's just a question of time, my friend.

    @ PiSRA

    Darwinian principles rule. We have amazing entertainers, newer improved versions coming in every year.

    ReplyDelete
  6. @kondy
    nice...

    @murty
    More greenery is in no way related to evolution... Its more to do with changes in admission criteria..

    @psr
    Alternate model?? Too much of parliamentary debating can be bad for you, huh? ...

    @lefty
    Is that your standard valentine's day excuse??? (MORE IMPORTANTLY, IS IT COPYRIGHTED??)

    @kondy
    nice again...

    ReplyDelete
  7. @ Murty,

    Greenery improves thats true. But my equation contained "beauty * intelligence * (AVAILABILITY)" - u seem to have ignored completely the third factor. And I don't believe discussing this with anyone (except Mister - who I have very faithfully mentioned)

    @ Pisra

    My model is in its developmental phases, my friend. So as long as I am not challenged in principle, its a victory by itself.

    @ Ahuja

    Thanku... And Jetty feels bad because you didn't mention him! Esp. since he thinks his comment is the only one which actually makes sense! :)

    ReplyDelete
  8. Is this how you spend Val-Day? God, you 9-pointers have a sad life.

    Hannyway, my reliable sources tell me you took a shower in the exalted company of Jetty (with both of you barenaked, might I add). Well, well... Lit 2nd year isn't a letdown, after all.

    ReplyDelete
  9. @ Dela

    A well fabricated story by HHH (who makes up "news" in order to retain the title of "Newsman" which he thinks belongs to him) and Jetty (who might well have been more than a little desperate on V- Day) has reached your ears.... Just to clarify, I chalked up this theory so as to identify and eradicate the flaws in the human system, so as to help the world (and in the process, myself) to spend future V - Days in better ways than this.

    ReplyDelete
  10. A variation would state that product of 'Beauty', 'Brains' and 'Availability' remains constant! (This is probably applicable irrespective of age and sex)

    Awesome!
    This post has consoled me greatly. As for the V-day, we expect you to go out with us next year. We all have the same fate, fingers crossed or not.

    ReplyDelete
  11. @ Vikesh

    Thank you! Your observations about our similar fates are perfectly justified and I think sudden changes are going to enter your life in the near future.... Of course, if nothing does change, going out with you guys will be the obvious choice (Don't think I'll write one more like this).

    ReplyDelete
  12. For all those despos out there, try out this pickup line to give ur relationships a 'kick' start...
    "Hey, do you have any raisins? No? How about a date?"

    ReplyDelete
  13. I expected such a post from you on V day. Following your blog and knowing your thought process has made you more predictable than you think. The post, of course, was better than anything you've ever written before (barring your poetry). Nevertheless, it poses a few questions.
    Shouldn't you concentrate on actually reducing your "availability" factor, even if it means forsaking the other 2(1 of which you don't possess much of, and a bit too much of the other. And yes, you will argue that I possess lesser of both compared to you, but sadly, your equation disproves it.)?
    You must have realized, that if you don't find a person of the opposite sex to be your companion within the first 6 months of college, chances are, you'll remain dry for the next 42. But this theory has its exceptions too.
    And a few correction factors have to be added to your equations, such as dressing sense and personality.
    And if this makes you feel better, my "committed" status didn't help me have much of a Valentine's day either, due to certain problems in the logistics area.
    Lastly, how the hell did you get a nickname like "Kondy"! And what is it supposed to mean?

    ReplyDelete
  14. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  15. @ Jetty

    That surely will result in a 'kick'. Not even the most dense 'fig-head' would say that!

    @ Ramzee

    Firstly, thank you for the enormous comment! I'm truly overwhelmed... Thank you for the compliment as well. As for the question, rest assured - reducing my 'availability factor' is the foremost among my priorities. And I hope to be part of those exceptions to your theory.... The law in actuality is very complex; it has merely been simplified to 3 variables. I'm sorry for that logistics problem you suffered, but the status itself is a consolation, I'm sure.

    And about the name 'Kondy'; thats a long story man... One that cannot be related here.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Whoa! Kondy's view on love! (I'd pretend, I never read the anti-Darwin's theory-theory; weird logic!) and as far as "many more good adjectives go here" goes:
    Pinky will be more than glad to help you with that!

    @Jetty:
    Get a life!

    ReplyDelete
  17. @ K'esp Ass (Notice the French touch)

    Believe it or not, this 'weird logic' is the closest we can get to solving certain problems of mankind.... As for the 'Pink-punk', I think we had enough of his "help" that day in Bus-T to last us a long, long time....

    @ Jetty,

    I can see that you are glad - at long last (your statements have finally been recognized)

    ReplyDelete
  18. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Ive 2 words for u which could turn out to be the perfect solution to all your problems... Up urs! :D

    ReplyDelete
  20. @ Jetty

    This would normally not merit a comment. But for the landmark's sake, here's 20.

    ReplyDelete